Anaesthetising ourselves: Engineering and technology education as a barrier to an ethical technology programme

L. Stapleton, C. O'Dowd Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes the idea of 'engineering consent' as an important ethical consideration for engineers. The paper illustrates the notion of tech no-culture, emphasising the n on-neutrality of technology in the world and how technology can be used in cultural and economic colonialisation by the west. It advocates a fundamental review of engineering education theory and practice. In this review, the paper argues that engineers must enter new spaces of thought and learning including the post-colonial 'Third Space' advocated by Homi K. Bhaba. The review of education must he based on current ideas as to professional competence, as well as a healthy approach to dissidence through innovative and creative thought processes. In this way a new community of practice wilt emerge which is centred not upon technological progress but social responsibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalIFAC-PapersOnLine
Volume36
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Event2003 IFAC Workshop on Technology and International Stability 2003 - Waterford, Ireland
Duration: 03 Jul 200305 Jul 2003

Keywords

  • Education
  • Engineering theory
  • Ethics
  • Social impact
  • Social stability. reflective learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anaesthetising ourselves: Engineering and technology education as a barrier to an ethical technology programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this