ANAESTHETISING OURSELVES: ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AS A BARRIER TO AN ETHICAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME

Larry Stapleton, Christine O'Dowd Smyth

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This paper proposes the idea of ‘engineering consent’ as an important ethical consideration for engineers. The paper illustrates the notion of techno-culture, emphasising the non-neutrality of technology in the world and how technology can be used in cultural and economic colonialisation by the west. It advocates a fundamental review of engineering education theory and practice. In this review, the paper argues that engineers must enter new spaces of thought and learning including the post-colonial ‘Third Space’ advocated by Homi K. Bhaba. The review of education must be based on current ideas as to professional competence, as well as a healthy approach to dissidence through innovative and creative thought processes. In this way a new community of practice will emerge which is centred not upon technological progress but social responsibility.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the SWIIS International Federation of Automation and Control Mini-Conference
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Publication series

NameProceedings of the SWIIS International Federation of Automation and Control Mini-Conference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ANAESTHETISING OURSELVES: ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AS A BARRIER TO AN ETHICAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this