Are financial analysts eager postmen of bubble psychology? Evidence in the United Kingdom

William P. Forbes, Áine Murphy, Cormac O'Keeffe, Chen Su

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the investment value of financial analysts' advice (earnings forecasts and stock recommendations) to shareholders around two recent bubble periods in the United Kingdom: the dot-com bubble period and the credit bubble period. We find that analysts' advice is valuable at the firm level, as reflected in their recommendations for high-tech stocks before and after the dot-com bubble burst. However, at the aggregate level, in neither bubble period do we uncover a stable relation between average stock returns and analysts' advice. The key to the lack of predictive power of analysts' advice does not seem to be their predictable nature, as the responsiveness of returns to such news, predicted or not, varies widely around the bubble periods studied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-137
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • aggregate earnings
  • analysts' stock recommendations
  • bubble psychology
  • earnings forecasts
  • earnings–returns relation
  • financial analysts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are financial analysts eager postmen of bubble psychology? Evidence in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this