TY - JOUR
T1 - Changing perceptions on PPP games
T2 - Demand risk in Irish roads
AU - Burke, Richard
AU - Demirag, Istemi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - This study is based on three Irish operational toll road public private partnership (PPP) case studies, including interviews with 38 key stakeholders. Our findings show that the Irish Government's treatment of risk and its transfer to the private partner in PPPs are changing over time. Regulatory changes, which have led to increased finance costs, coupled with a severe global economic crisis, have exacerbated the difficulties in funding PPPs. The goalposts in Irish PPPs appear to be changing in favour of the private partner at the expense of the taxpayers, who are the losers in the PPP game. The Government are also suggesting that they may potentially step in, if projects experienced financial difficulty and the special purpose vehicle (SPV) may require specific guarantees in order to participate in future PPP projects. Pricing of demand risk also differs from the Government's rhetoric that it is being priced realistically. In practice, we find that it is priced aggressively by the SPV in order to win PPP contracts. The paper discusses the possible implications of these findings for value for money (VFM) and, ultimately, taxpayers.
AB - This study is based on three Irish operational toll road public private partnership (PPP) case studies, including interviews with 38 key stakeholders. Our findings show that the Irish Government's treatment of risk and its transfer to the private partner in PPPs are changing over time. Regulatory changes, which have led to increased finance costs, coupled with a severe global economic crisis, have exacerbated the difficulties in funding PPPs. The goalposts in Irish PPPs appear to be changing in favour of the private partner at the expense of the taxpayers, who are the losers in the PPP game. The Government are also suggesting that they may potentially step in, if projects experienced financial difficulty and the special purpose vehicle (SPV) may require specific guarantees in order to participate in future PPP projects. Pricing of demand risk also differs from the Government's rhetoric that it is being priced realistically. In practice, we find that it is priced aggressively by the SPV in order to win PPP contracts. The paper discusses the possible implications of these findings for value for money (VFM) and, ultimately, taxpayers.
KW - Change in perceptions
KW - Demand risk allocation and transfer
KW - Estimating demand risk
KW - Public private partnerships
KW - Toll roads
KW - Value for money
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924278025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.11.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924278025
SN - 1045-2354
VL - 27
SP - 189
EP - 208
JO - Critical Perspectives on Accounting
JF - Critical Perspectives on Accounting
ER -