EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGM

Larry Stapleton; C. Murphy

doi:10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446

EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGM

Larry Stapleton, C. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The assumption that functionally rational notations can represent organisational spaces is central to engineering diagrammatical approaches in the delivery of advanced technology. This is reflected in a approach to notations which assumes objective, rationalistic ontologies. This paper opens the debate on research into notations and their relationship to sound method and socio-technical issues, suggesting that researchers need to rethink the ways in which the world is represented in engineering documentation, especially Requirements Engineering and Business Process Re-Engineering (BPRE). Empirical data from 9 companies and 48 people involved in manufacturing systems projects is presented which provides evidence for this position.

Original language	English
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446
Publication status	Published - 2003
Event	International Federation of Automation and Control (IFAC) 2003 World Congress - Duration: 01 Jan 2003 → …

Conference

Conference	International Federation of Automation and Control (IFAC) 2003 World Congress
Period	01/01/2003 → …

Access to Document

10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446

EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGMOther version, 0 bytes

http://repository.wit.ie/id/document/623

Cite this

@conference{94e6f85bf90443b7af8ae6206113aeeb,

title = "EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGM",

abstract = "The assumption that functionally rational notations can represent organisational spaces is central to engineering diagrammatical approaches in the delivery of advanced technology. This is reflected in a approach to notations which assumes objective, rationalistic ontologies. This paper opens the debate on research into notations and their relationship to sound method and socio-technical issues, suggesting that researchers need to rethink the ways in which the world is represented in engineering documentation, especially Requirements Engineering and Business Process Re-Engineering (BPRE). Empirical data from 9 companies and 48 people involved in manufacturing systems projects is presented which provides evidence for this position.",

author = "Larry Stapleton and C. Murphy",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446",

language = "English",

note = "International Federation of Automation and Control (IFAC) 2003 World Congress ; Conference date: 01-01-2003",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGM

AU - Stapleton, Larry

AU - Murphy, C.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The assumption that functionally rational notations can represent organisational spaces is central to engineering diagrammatical approaches in the delivery of advanced technology. This is reflected in a approach to notations which assumes objective, rationalistic ontologies. This paper opens the debate on research into notations and their relationship to sound method and socio-technical issues, suggesting that researchers need to rethink the ways in which the world is represented in engineering documentation, especially Requirements Engineering and Business Process Re-Engineering (BPRE). Empirical data from 9 companies and 48 people involved in manufacturing systems projects is presented which provides evidence for this position.

AB - The assumption that functionally rational notations can represent organisational spaces is central to engineering diagrammatical approaches in the delivery of advanced technology. This is reflected in a approach to notations which assumes objective, rationalistic ontologies. This paper opens the debate on research into notations and their relationship to sound method and socio-technical issues, suggesting that researchers need to rethink the ways in which the world is represented in engineering documentation, especially Requirements Engineering and Business Process Re-Engineering (BPRE). Empirical data from 9 companies and 48 people involved in manufacturing systems projects is presented which provides evidence for this position.

U2 - 10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446

DO - 10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01446

M3 - Paper

T2 - International Federation of Automation and Control (IFAC) 2003 World Congress

Y2 - 1 January 2003

ER -

EXAMINING NON-REPRESENTATION IN ENGINEERING NOTATIONS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETENESS OF THE FUNCTIONALLY-RATIONAL MODELLING PARADIGM

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this