Improving Commissioning and Qualification Delivery Using Last Planner System®

William Power, Derek Sinnott, Aidan Mullin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Question: Can the Last Planner System® enhance the Commissioning and Qualification phase of project delivery? Purpose: Evaluation of Last Planner System in the Commissioning and Qualification phase of project execution; identifies challenges; proposes mitigations and opportunities for enhancing future implementations. Research Method: Mixed-methods approach encompassing critical literature review, site documentation data-analysis, focus groups, and semi-structured purposeful interviews. Findings: Last Planner System offers distinct value-add to Commissioning and Qualification. However, there is need for increased involvement of upstream and downstream players in planning construction production processes. Limitations: Conducted on a single project with limited sample size. Implications: Paper offers value for clients and practitioners as Last Planner System in the Commissioning and Qualification phase of project execution facilitates greater collaboration, increased visibility of workflow, and resulting productivity, schedule alignment, safety, cost, and client value-add benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-52
Number of pages17
JournalLean Construction Journal
Volume2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • handoff
  • Last Planner System®
  • Lean Construction
  • lookahead planning
  • workflow

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Commissioning and Qualification Delivery Using Last Planner System®'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this