TY - JOUR
T1 - Microstructure and fracture behavior of friction stir lap welding of dissimilar aa 6060-t5/ pure copper
AU - Narasimharaju, Shubhavardhan Ramadurga
AU - Sankunny, Surendran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This study aims to understand the uncertainty about the optimum or best pin position (Dp) for friction stir lap welding (FSLW) of Al-Cu. Tensile shear testing is used to determine the Mechanical strength of FSL welds under static loading. Fracture strength (σLap) corresponding to the maximum load in a test over the sample width is used as the strength value. Interface microstructures differ depending on whether the tool pin penetrates the lapping interface. It has been found that σLap values of the defect free weld samples vary quite significantly and in general are significantly higher than those reported in the literature. When the pin penetration is close to zero no intermetallic layers were formed, hence the value of σLap was zero. When the pin penetration is 0.4mm, the commonly observed a thin Al–Cu interface layer forms and this layer does not grow beyond 3µm. It is shown that the thin interfacial layer can withstand a high tensile-shear load and thus the adjacent Al material shears to fracture. When the pin penetrates more than 0.4mm, the commonly observed mix stir zone (MSZ) forms and values of σLap are lower than that of 0.4mm pin penetration welds but remain quite high.
AB - This study aims to understand the uncertainty about the optimum or best pin position (Dp) for friction stir lap welding (FSLW) of Al-Cu. Tensile shear testing is used to determine the Mechanical strength of FSL welds under static loading. Fracture strength (σLap) corresponding to the maximum load in a test over the sample width is used as the strength value. Interface microstructures differ depending on whether the tool pin penetrates the lapping interface. It has been found that σLap values of the defect free weld samples vary quite significantly and in general are significantly higher than those reported in the literature. When the pin penetration is close to zero no intermetallic layers were formed, hence the value of σLap was zero. When the pin penetration is 0.4mm, the commonly observed a thin Al–Cu interface layer forms and this layer does not grow beyond 3µm. It is shown that the thin interfacial layer can withstand a high tensile-shear load and thus the adjacent Al material shears to fracture. When the pin penetrates more than 0.4mm, the commonly observed mix stir zone (MSZ) forms and values of σLap are lower than that of 0.4mm pin penetration welds but remain quite high.
KW - Friction stir lap welding Aluminum Copper Interface microstructure Intermetallic layer Fracture strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068779727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5267/j.esm.2019.5.002
DO - 10.5267/j.esm.2019.5.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068779727
SN - 2291-8744
VL - 7
SP - 217
EP - 228
JO - Engineering Solid Mechanics
JF - Engineering Solid Mechanics
IS - 3
ER -