TY - GEN
T1 - Representation and evaluation of product design in research assessment: A case study of the UK REF 2014
T2 - 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2014
AU - Maher, Carmel
AU - Hadfield, Mark
AU - Hutchings, Maggie
AU - De Eyto, Adam
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The social practice of design and design research and is continually evolving to meet the needs of society. Its representation and evaluation in research assessment exercises, such as the UK (Research Excellence Framework) REF 2014[1] has a key role to play in its evolution. Higher education curriculum is affected by this type of representation due to the alignment of academic research inquiry. This paper examines through a documentary analysis of the REF 2014, the practice of funding evaluation exercises to discover and describe how they work and to provide a critique of those practices, using critical discourse analysis. By using Fairclough's[2] three dimensional framework for examining discursive events, it is possible to explore the "relationships of causality and determination"[2] between discursive practices (the evaluation and subsequent funding of UK Higher Education research) and texts (REF 2014) and the wider social and cultural structures and processes which are influencing and being influenced by it. The analysis reveals the considerable influence of REF 2014 in the discourses of other stakeholders and the dominance within those discourses of market system structures where accountability, public relations and intense competition are fundamental to their operation. It raises questions about the nature of research assessment exercises, their ability to reward a diverse range of research in a fair and equitable manner and the impact of research assessment exercises on research inquiry, academic freedom and originality in universities.
AB - The social practice of design and design research and is continually evolving to meet the needs of society. Its representation and evaluation in research assessment exercises, such as the UK (Research Excellence Framework) REF 2014[1] has a key role to play in its evolution. Higher education curriculum is affected by this type of representation due to the alignment of academic research inquiry. This paper examines through a documentary analysis of the REF 2014, the practice of funding evaluation exercises to discover and describe how they work and to provide a critique of those practices, using critical discourse analysis. By using Fairclough's[2] three dimensional framework for examining discursive events, it is possible to explore the "relationships of causality and determination"[2] between discursive practices (the evaluation and subsequent funding of UK Higher Education research) and texts (REF 2014) and the wider social and cultural structures and processes which are influencing and being influenced by it. The analysis reveals the considerable influence of REF 2014 in the discourses of other stakeholders and the dominance within those discourses of market system structures where accountability, public relations and intense competition are fundamental to their operation. It raises questions about the nature of research assessment exercises, their ability to reward a diverse range of research in a fair and equitable manner and the impact of research assessment exercises on research inquiry, academic freedom and originality in universities.
KW - Critical discourse analysis (CDA)
KW - Higher education research funding
KW - Product design education
KW - Product design representation and evaluation
KW - UK ref 2014
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963812239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84963812239
T3 - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education and Human Technology Relations, E and PDE 2014
SP - 437
EP - 442
BT - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education and Human Technology Relations, E and PDE 2014
A2 - Wits, Wessel
A2 - Bohemia, Erik
A2 - Eggink, Wouter
A2 - Eger, Arthur
A2 - Kovacevic, Ahmed
A2 - Parkinson, Brian
PB - Institution of Engineering Designers, The Design Society
Y2 - 4 September 2014 through 5 September 2014
ER -