Abstract
The new ISO 12913-1 introduces a conceptional framework for the ”Soundscape” approach and refers to
”factors relevant for measurement and reporting of soundscape studies, as well as planning, design and
management of soundscape”. This emphasizes a common ground to Soundscape for Acousticians and
Architects/Urban Designers (among others): for Acousticians to investigate sound qualities in relation to
their specific context, and for Architects/Urban Designers to pro-actively implement sound qualities into
their designs. However, both professions usually come from fundamentally different perspectives:
Acousticians rather act as ”analysts”: they observe specific environments in order to derive findings, such
as patterns, generalizations or rules; Architects tend to do the exact opposite and act as ”synthesizers”: they
use patterns, generalizations and rules, in order to integrate them into the design of a specific environment.
Consequently, the expectations and the outcome of a ”standardization” approach may differ significantly.
The paper discusses the underlying triangulation principle of the soundscape-approach based on ”peoplecontext-
acoustic environment” against a proposed similar triangulation of the Architectural/Urban design
process based on ”programme-context-idea”. It explores the potentials of the Soundscape approach from an
Architect’s view and the way it could be enhanced by an interdisciplinary approach as anticipated in the
new ISO.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Internoise 2016 (Proceedings) |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The new ISO-standard on ”Soundscape” - Maximizing the benefit for the Architectural design process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver