Abstract
Strategy documents are curious artefacts of the modern organisation. They represent
formal strategic planning processes that have come under criticism, in part for not
representing the emergent strategy path that organisations follow in practice. This
criticism of formal planning’s efficacy has coincided with a marked decline of research
output in this field. This is at odds with the practice world of strategy, where formal
strategic planning has become a hallmark of good governance. A Strategy-as-Practice
(S-a-P) stream of research has emerged over the last fifteen years to counter this divide
between theory and practice and has largely focused on the micro-practices of strategy
making. This study is firmly rooted in this tradition of looking at the micro-practices of
strategy work to offer novel explication on new ways of organising. This study follows
the social life of a strategy document in an institute of higher education from its initial
conception, writing, consultation and use, to understand the role these curious
documents play in organisational life.
Philosophically, this work is inductive, phenomenological, and interpretive. As a
process, it presents an ethnography of strategy making, an autoethnography of strategy
consultations, a deconstruction of the strategy text produced as an output, and
interviews with all those in and around the strategy document’s life in the organisation.
Themes of power and dramaturgy emerged in the exploration of strategy making that
are further developed by reflecting on how the strategy interacts with organisational
life. The tightly controlled and somewhat inauthentic strategy-making, reveals a
surprising emancipatory aspiration that is reflected through the strategy in use. These
findings question the the lack of focus on the concept of power in the strategy research
agenda.
The work follows a single strategy document’s life and therefore has a limited claim to
generalisability, however, in presenting an all-encompassing view of strategy work
through the strategy document, the work presents a totalising account of the role of this
document in an organisation. This is a coherent account of the social life of a strategy
document from in inception to its life in the organisation. The work adds to an emerging
critical perspective on strategy practices and is of interest to managers and strategists
alike in considering the process of writing, consulting and calling upon their strategy
documents. The study adds a new perspective to the meaning of strategy work in the
modern ideal of the university.
Keywords: Strategy-as-Practice, Open Strategy, Higher Education Strategy,
Ethnography
Original language | English |
---|---|
Awarding Institution | |
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Publication status | Unpublished - 2018 |
Keywords
- Strategy-as-Practice, Open Strategy, Higher Education Strategy, Ethnography